Best Drilling & WellJet Collaborate to Rehabilitate and Redevelop a Production Well for the California Water Service Company
California Water Service Company’s Well DOM 294-01 was drilled and constructed by Beylik Drilling in 1994, using the reverse circulation rotary drilling method. It features 16” diameter 5/16-inch wall thickness mild steel casing from ground surface to 740 bgs, and from 980 to 1,000 ft. bgs, with 0.070-inch horizontal louvered openings from 740 to 980 ft bgs – a total of 240 ft. of perforations. At the time of completion, static water level was 36’. The well was test-pumped to 1,500 gpm, with a drawdown of 56’.
When first put into production, DOM 294-01 produced approximately 1,200 gpm with 45 feet of drawdown, for a specific capacity of 26.7. Over the next several years, the well was mostly idle for extended periods of time (due to water quality issues), punctuated with periodic pump-to-waste events.
In 2012, the well was pumped at rates similar to those recorded at the time of construction.
In mid-2013, the well was brushed – and then again sat idle, this time for over a year.
In early October 2014, Cal Water proceeded with testing a new pump/motor, since 294-01 was to be the sole source of feedwater for an on-site treatment plant then nearing completion. The new configuration was designed to produce 1,200 gpm – as the well had done historically.
During testing, however, the pump/motor broke suction within 1 to 2 minutes of startup. Subsequent testing with adjusting the Cla-Val and/or gate valve on the discharge did not bring any favorable results:
| Q (gpm) | Time (sec) | Cum. Time (sec) | Notes |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Start |
| 945 | 26 | 26 | High |
| 840 | 7 | 33 | Stabilized |
| 820 | 10 | 43 | Start reduce |
| 750 | 19 | 62 | Cont. reduce |
| 0 | 7 | 69 | Quick dropoff |
For a certain time period during one of the testing days, Cal Water was able to maintain a continuous flow of 160 gpm – only about 13% of desired flow rate.
A prominent groundwater consulting firm was tasked with providing recommendations regarding rehabilitation and redevelopment of the well.
On October 27, 2014, a downhole video survey was performed by Pacific Surveys. It showed small, dark nodules throughout the submerged portion of the well, and significant volumes of sediment on the louvers. The observed sediment did not appear to be cemented, leading the consulting firm to conclude that the “fouling process that has led to reduction in the instantaneous production rate is likely occurring within the filter pack and near-well zone.”
The consultants recommended removal of sediment and debris, followed by WellJet “to loosen and dislodge a maximum amount of clogging, encrusting and/or biofouling materials present within the well and within the filter pack and near-well zone.”
WellJet (US Patent No. 8,312,930) utilizes a combination of highly pressurized water, specially constructed high-pressure hose, a unique delivery mechanism, and a series of custom-built nozzles on a self-rotating head to remove obstructions from inside the well casing and screen, and to generate disruptive energy deep into the gravel pack and near-well formation to break up harmful deposits that impede water flow.
Consultants further recommended following jetting with chemical cleaning, initial development by airlifting and swabbing, and final development by pumping and surging.
On December 13, 2014, a preliminary step drawdown aquifer pumping test was conducted. DOM 294-01 now produced 1,200 gpm, with a drawdown of 24 feet, for a specific capacity of 51. This was the design discharge rate, with an overall efficiency considerably better than when the well was new:
| Parameters | Short-Term (1 day) | Long-Term (1 year) |
| Design Pumping Rate | 1,200 gpm | 1,200 gpm |
| Design Drawdown | 24 ft | 39 ft |
| Design Well Efficiency | 55% | – |
| Static Water Level | 71 ft bgs | 71 ft bgs |
| Total Lift to Surface | 95 ft | 110 ft |
Pumping rates were limited due to discharge restrictions. If not for those restrictions, Cal Water would have pursued test pumping at a higher rate. However, the above flow rate of 1,200 gpm met Cal Water’s needs, as the treatment plant served by DOM 294-01 was designed for 1,200 gpm.
As a result of this success, the decision was made to forego chemical treatment and additional pumping and surging.
According to a representative of Cal Water: “The results after the WellJet process were favorable and accomplished what was desired.”
